<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: L.A. Times Editorial Supports Free Access to Taxpayer-Funded Research</title>
	<link>http://blogs.library.ucla.edu/ipmanagement/2007/08/07/la-times-editorial-supports-free-access-to-taxpayer-funded-research/</link>
	<description>The Latest News for the UCLA Scholarly Community</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Medical</title>
		<link>http://blogs.library.ucla.edu/ipmanagement/2007/08/07/la-times-editorial-supports-free-access-to-taxpayer-funded-research/#comment-495</link>
		<author>Texas Medical</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 03:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.library.ucla.edu/ipmanagement/2007/08/07/la-times-editorial-supports-free-access-to-taxpayer-funded-research/#comment-495</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the informative post.. and thanks for adding our comment to the blog. I am subscribing to your feed so I don\'t miss the next post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the informative post.. and thanks for adding our comment to the blog. I am subscribing to your feed so I don\&#8217;t miss the next post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MartaB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.library.ucla.edu/ipmanagement/2007/08/07/la-times-editorial-supports-free-access-to-taxpayer-funded-research/#comment-2</link>
		<author>MartaB</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.library.ucla.edu/ipmanagement/2007/08/07/la-times-editorial-supports-free-access-to-taxpayer-funded-research/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>This blog looks great!  Why leave it in the sandbox?  Of course, I missed the last meeting where everyone probably discussed reasons to leave it in the sandbox, but I don't see any obvious reasons why it shouldn't go live sooner rather than later.  The Texas Digital Library scholarly communications blog that Sharon pointed us to has a bit more polish, but I think that polish can develop over time.  Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog looks great!  Why leave it in the sandbox?  Of course, I missed the last meeting where everyone probably discussed reasons to leave it in the sandbox, but I don&#8217;t see any obvious reasons why it shouldn&#8217;t go live sooner rather than later.  The Texas Digital Library scholarly communications blog that Sharon pointed us to has a bit more polish, but I think that polish can develop over time.  Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
